Logo-ajchor

Submitted: 28 Sep 2025
Revision: 22 Oct 2025
Accepted: 03 Nov 2025
ePublished: 16 Dec 2025
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

Avicenna J Care Health Oper Room. 2020;3(4): 125-129.
doi: 10.34172/ajchor.110
  Abstract View: 12
  PDF Download: 7

Original Article

Effects of a Protective Intubation Box on Success and Duration of Tracheal Intubation in Elective Surgeries: A Randomized Trial

Azar Ejmalian 1 ORCID logo, Reza Salehi 2, Kamelia Ghajarzadeh 3, Alireza Pournajafian 1* ORCID logo

1 Department of Anesthesia, Firoozgar Hospital, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Anesthesia, Motahhari Hospital, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Alireza Pournajafian, Email: alipn78@yahoo.com

Abstract

Introduction: The protection of healthcare personnel during airway procedures became a major concern during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study was conducted to examine the effects of intubation box on the duration and success of tracheal intubation in patients undergoing general anesthesia.

Methods: This randomized clinical trial was carried out at Firoozgar Hospital, affiliated with Iran University of Medical Sciences in 2022. A total of 80 adult surgical candidates were allocated to either conventional laryngoscopic intubation or intubation with a barrier box. Demographic variables were recorded, intubation success was confirmed by capnography, and the time required for tube placement was measured by an independent observer.

Results: Gender, age, and BMI distribution showed no significant difference between groups (P>0.05). The mean intubation time was markedly shorter using standard technique (8.32±0.62 seconds) than using the box-assisted method (11.48±0.80 seconds). This difference was more pronounced in male patients. The success rate of intubation was 100% with the conventional approach and 92.5% in the box group, although this finding was not statistically significant (P=0.12). No post-operative voice changes or vocal cord complications occurred.

Conclusion: While intubation boxes may provide additional protection against aerosol exposure, their use may prolong intubation time, particularly in male patients, without improving success rates. Therefore, their application should balance protective benefits against potential delays in airway management.



Please cite this article as follows: Ejmalian A, Salehi R, Ghajarzadeh K, Pournajafian A. Effects of a protective intubation box on success and duration of tracheal intubation in an elective surgery: a randomized trial. Avicenna J Care Health Oper Room 2025;3(4):125-129. doi:10.34172/ajchor.110
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 13

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

PDF Download: 7

Your browser does not support the canvas element.